Friday, 20 November 2009

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

Tuesday, 17 November 2009

  • Currently
    Orphans [Fold-out Digipak with 24-page booklet]
    By Tom Waits
    see related

    Music post

    ok...I was talking to two xangans about music so I figured I would just list some of my favorite bands. I have very broad taste in music. I don't like country music, but everything else is good to go with me.

    These ones listed are some of my major favorites.

    1. Rammstein--everyone knows I like them by now. I enjoy the big sound they create and some of the lyrics I find fascinating.

    2. Denali--very different from Rammstein. Rammstein and Denali both create songs of character. And the singer of this band is fucking hot.

    3. Engine Down--Been one of my favorites for years, the singer of this band is actually the brother of the singer in Denali. They made a song together once...epic lol.

    4. Pixies--just cause their songs are f'n weird and cool.

    5. Beirut--been a fan since '07. Very original stuff, but not for everyone.

    6. Elliott Smith--play 5 seconds of any of his songs and I can tell you which one it is. I think the beatles are over rated cause Elliott Smith did their style better.

    7. Calexico--again, play 5 seconds of any of their songs and I'll tell you what its name is. This was my favorite in 2005.

    8. Bjork--listened to her constantly during the final days of flight school. Bjork and Denali were an ethereal mix for flying.

    9. Tom Waits. Tom Waits. Tom f'n Waits. Play 5 seconds, I tell you the name. I consider Tom Waits to be the #1 American musician--his music is quintessentially "American" in my mind. He isn't widely known like some assholes who are American classics...but those American classics often have a song written by Tom Waits.

    "Walk Away" reminds me of South Dakota--northern plains.

    His version of "Goodnight Irene" reminds me of North Dakota.

    "On the Road" is awesome, in those geographic terms, despite being based on a no talent ass-clown's poem.

    "Tango 'til They're Sore" reminds me of St Louis, New Orleans, New York all at once.

    So much awesome in Tom Waits.

    10. Foo Fighers. 5 seconds, song named.

    Some more favorites: Blue Foundation, Blonde Redhead, Bon Iver, Belle and Sebastian, Anjali, Sparta, Yann Tiersen, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, Decemberists and Tarkio, Taraf de Haidouks, Ray Lamontagne, Lhasa, Regina Spektor, Portishead, Phillip Glass, Nirvana, Mirah, John Frusciante, HIM, Godspeed's 9375 minute long songs, Emiliana Torrini, Cocorosie, Amon Tobin. There are some more, but that's an idea.

Thursday, 12 November 2009

  • ma is funny

    My mother asked me to do research into this one thing called the Native American "Ten Commandments" which is kinda lame but it shows up everywhere--pan-indianism, essentially. But when I located the origin for her, which was a wasicu organization for romanticizing Indian culture for use by wasicus and freemasons back in the 1920s, she wrote this back:

    "Lol.  Okay so I will blame freemasons (or freemasonics).  That's probably a grown-ups boys scout organization.  Among those who practice Lakota, the word 'pan-Indianism' is used a lot.  I've used the term to describe curriculum, phrases, dreamcatchers, etc., anything that doesn't identify a specific tribe but says generally 'Indians or Native Americans or American Indians believe . . .'  I see it a lot with new age people who tend to take a dreamcatcher for example and use it as a charm to sell to others to make money and tell them there's certain things they must do to make the dreamcatcher 'work.'  Or, recently, the one who incorporated a 'sweat' lodge based on our culture and killed three people and hospitalized 19.  Bastards from hell misappropriating our lifeways.  lol"


    el oh el.

    Also: I got even more work, so my xanga time shall be more sporadic, unless I drink more coffee. Hope everyone is doing well this morning.

Monday, 09 November 2009

  • Currently
    9
    By Damien Rice
    see related

    For Jane

    This is actually something I've intended to write for a while....

    I found Janey McJanestein through an apyus rec about a year ago, and I found what she wrote to be very interesting. And I then read another entry she had that was very interesting. So I subscribed but really didn't comment--it seemed that Jane was quite selective of her commenters and a private person. So I just read from a distance...and then she showed up and said things like "I know you're stalking me you freak, you don't want to piss me off, you better comment or I'll pwn your ass, amigo." To which I replied "Hey, watch the language. I'll comment, but because I want to, not cause you said to." In reality I was quite intimidated but I had to put on an act.

    It is true, however, that she is a very private person--only some things I could gather from her website: She is a very good and precise thinker, she has an affinity for truth, her site is dedicated to her beautiful daughter, and that she is a Heroes fan (at the time last year she had a count-down timer for the season premier.)

    And there were things to come from each of those four things I gathered initially: She can be very intellectually stimulating in conversation, she doesn't care about being "right" but she does care about being real and genuine, she is beautiful like her daughter, and I am now addicted to Heroes.

    Janefred Jangleheimerschmidt also has a vast collection of pens and markers.



    This is because there are times she *really* has to write shit down...apparently.

    But she does work with some print and paper design stuff. It is one of her hobbies--and I think she does it pretty well!

    She is also a fiction prose and poetry writer--if you read her website, and I encourage you to do so, you will see some of the things she writes.

    She has a lot of emotional intelligence, has allegiance strongly to those things she knows to be right and true, and respects others and others' values. She is a private person--and grants that to everyone else. These qualities have made her into one of my best friends: She can understand, do the right thing, respect, and truly has a "vault" (Seinfeld reference: ...if you tell her something you want kept private, she'll keep it private forever lol.) Plus, she is cute, so that helps, too.

    This one is a true blue.

    {Insert Jane-love below; or visit her site.}

Thursday, 05 November 2009

  • Currently
    PHP and MySQL Web Development (4th Edition)
    By Luke Welling, Laura Thomson
    see related

    Bad Writing.

    A recent pulse reminded me of Orwell's essay "Politics and the English Language" (http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm).

    Inside the pulse I had written the following, with help from Besty.

    "Irregardless, it would do whomever well to rememberize improvemental verbiage."

    And then I looked up the essay to read these paragraphs that always brought me lawls.

    "These five passages have not been picked out because they are especially bad -- I could have quoted far worse if I had chosen -- but because they illustrate various of the mental vices from which we now suffer. They are a little below the average, but are fairly representative examples. I number them so that i can refer back to them when necessary:

          1. I am not, indeed, sure whether it is not true to say that the Milton who once seemed not unlike a seventeenth-century Shelley had not become, out of an experience ever more bitter in each year, more alien [sic] to the founder of that Jesuit sect which nothing could induce him to tolerate.

          Professor Harold Laski (Essay in Freedom of Expression)

          2. Above all, we cannot play ducks and drakes with a native battery of idioms which prescribes egregious collocations of vocables as the Basic put up with for tolerate, or put at a loss for bewilder .

          Professor Lancelot Hogben (Interglossa)

          3. On the one side we have the free personality: by definition it is not neurotic, for it has neither conflict nor dream. Its desires, such as they are, are transparent, for they are just what institutional approval keeps in the forefront of consciousness; another institutional pattern would alter their number and intensity; there is little in them that is natural, irreducible, or culturally dangerous. But on the other side, the social bond itself is nothing but the mutual reflection of these self-secure integrities. Recall the definition of love. Is not this the very picture of a small academic? Where is there a place in this hall of mirrors for either personality or fraternity?

          Essay on psychology in Politics (New York)

          4. All the "best people" from the gentlemen's clubs, and all the frantic fascist captains, united in common hatred of Socialism and bestial horror at the rising tide of the mass revolutionary movement, have turned to acts of provocation, to foul incendiarism, to medieval legends of poisoned wells, to legalize their own destruction of proletarian organizations, and rouse the agitated petty-bourgeoise to chauvinistic fervor on behalf of the fight against the revolutionary way out of the crisis.

          Communist pamphlet

          5. If a new spirit is to be infused into this old country, there is one thorny and contentious reform which must be tackled, and that is the humanization and galvanization of the B.B.C. Timidity here will bespeak canker and atrophy of the soul. The heart of Britain may be sound and of strong beat, for instance, but the British lion's roar at present is like that of Bottom in Shakespeare's Midsummer Night's Dream -- as gentle as any sucking dove. A virile new Britain cannot continue indefinitely to be traduced in the eyes or rather ears, of the world by the effete languors of Langham Place, brazenly masquerading as "standard English." When the Voice of Britain is heard at nine o'clock, better far and infinitely less ludicrous to hear aitches honestly dropped than the present priggish, inflated, inhibited, school-ma'amish arch braying of blameless bashful mewing maidens!

          Letter in Tribune"

    Oh my lawls.

Tuesday, 03 November 2009

  • Physical Dynamics of Flight

    An aircraft has four basic "forces" acting on it during flight.

    These can be visualized as vector components--like arrows pointing in the direction of the force taking into account the magnitude of the force.

    In straight and level flight, where the aircraft is not turning or ascending or descending, the four forces are equal--canceling each other out to keep the airplane in the air. To achieve this, and airplane uses its engines to produce thrust to counteract aerodynamic drag--and it uses its wings to counteract gravity.

    The four forces listed are Thrust, Lift, Drag, Gravity/Weight.





    Control

    An airplane has three control methods: Aileron (also flaperons), elevator, and rudder. They are controlled with the control yoke and floor pedals (which tilt for the brakes.)

    Elevator:


    By pulling the yoke toward one's body, the aircraft will pitch upward--pushing the yoke away will cause a pitch downward.

    This changes the attitude of the aircraft, as indicated by the attitude indicator.




    Aileron:

    By turning the yoke like you would a car's steering wheel, it will cause the airplane to roll from side to side. This happens because when one turns the yoke to the right, the aileron on the left wing raises and causes that wing to drop--and the right aileron lowers, causing it to ascend.


    The result of the turn can be seen in the attitude indicator--which will tell you the degree of the roll. For a shallow turn, a 5-15 degree turn; for a medium turn, 15-30; for a steep turn, 45 to 90 degrees is used.

    Rudder:

    The pedals on the floor are pressed in the direction of the yaw desired.


    The rudder is a very important control surface--it can cause skids and slips and also to maintain a coordinated turn. Aircraft use "forward slips" to slow down, and "side slips" to line up for landing in cross-winds. A forward slip can be used for an emergency descent to regulate speed--full rudder to one side, aileron in the opposite direction--the flight path remains forward, but the aircraft is then pointing several degrees away causing great aerodynamic drag. This drag is compensated by converting altitude into speed--thus a very fast descent is initiated.



    In windy conditions, an airplane's flight path is often a few or more degrees away from the direction of the aircraft--the airplane appears to be flying crooked. That is called "crabbing." On landing in a cross wind, an airplane "crabs" toward the runway, but it cannot land in a crab angle (some can, but most do not), thus the aircraft will roll into the wind and then use rudder to counteract the turn--the side slip points the airplane in the direction of the flight path along the runway, allowing it to land while pointing forward.



    If the wind gets underneath the wing of the aircraft during an unsuccessful side slip, a ground loop can result:



    Turning:


    A turn is initiated by using the ailerons to roll the airplane into the desired angle.

    This initial move results in two things: Adverse yaw and loss of lift.

    Thinking in terms of vector components as above, lift is always perpendicular to the wings--because the wings produce the lift. When the aircraft rolls, so do the wings, thus the lift component is also angled the same as the bank. Gravity, however, continues to pull down at a (mostly) constant angle--straight downwards. Due to the loss of lift component, the airplane will begin to descend upon turning.

     

    Thus slight elevator pressure is necessary to increase the lift component--this counteracts the tendency to sink. The turn occurs because of the tilting of the lift component, it gives power to the horizontal component--the airplane will turn. This causes a resultant load, plus the extra lift of the elevator, can cause a change in how gravity is experienced--in a 60 degree turn requiring higher elevator input, one's own weight will be experienced as twice or greater than it is standing on the ground. A 160 lbs pilot would feel like 320lbs or more in a steep turn.

    And so one needs muscle, as well as money, to fly.

    When you turn an airplane by twisting the yoke, the turn does not start immediately--this is due to adverse yaw.

    When a turn is initiated, one aileron becomes elevated while the other drops. This changes the chord of the airfoil--a higher angle of attack and greater drag is experienced by the wing with the "down" aileron. This makes the airplane yaw in the opposite direction of the roll--adverse yaw.

    Adverse yaw makes a turn uncoordinated. An uncoordinated turn is at least imprecise, and at most fatal.

    To make the turn coordinated again, rudder is applied also in the direction of the turn--by using the turn coordinator to gauge when the aircraft is in a coordinated turn.




    The little ball must be kept between the lines to keep the aircraft coordinated--if it goes to the left, hit the left pedal, and on the right, step the right pedal. It doesn't make much. There are times when this instrument is unreliable, however....

Saturday, 31 October 2009

  • Currently
    National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA): Aerodynamic Characteristics of 15 NACA Airfoil Sections At Seven Reynolds Numbers from 0.7 x 10 6 to 9.0 x 10 6: October 1949
    By Laurence K. Jr.; Hamilton A. Smith Loftin
    see related

    Physics of Flight

    When I enrolled at flight school, the assistant Chief Certified Flight Instructor (CFI) asked me a simple question: Tom, do you know what makes an airplane fly?

    Before I could explain to show my knowledge, he laughed and said "money."

    That's incredibly true heh....

    But there are also some physical dynamics that occur. As one might know, it is the wings that cause an airplane to fly. When you look at the wing of an airplane, you'll notice that there is a particular shape--this is called the airfoil. It is flattened on one side, and curved on the other side. The desired effect of this shape is based on the facts established by Bernoulli's principle. When a fluid passes through a space of a specific area, and this area changes, so does the pressure of the fluid.

    In the case of flight, when air traveling through space meets a changing area it also changes pressure. The area on top of the wing, the area that is not flat, experiences relatively lower pressure than the bottom of the wing.


    The resulting forces of this inequality of pressure create lift for the aircraft.

    Depending on the design of the airfoil, one can optimize lift according to the performance of the aircraft (a Cessna needs a thicker wing, a high upper camber, because it is expected to cruise below 160 knots.)



    (When I was 12 I bought a book of airfoils that was made by the extinct NACA--it also had British, German, and French airfoil data as well. I used this to cut just the right size airfoil for my first model aircraft. I still have it in case anyone wants me to scan a page of the book to see airfoil data.)

    I will write more on airplane stuff as I prepare for my BFR later this month--I'll try to post on the more interesting stuff lol.



Thursday, 29 October 2009

  • Currently
    Paradise on the steppe: A cultural history of the Kutschurgan, Beresan, and Liebental colonists, 1804-1972
    By Joseph S Height
    see related

    Mongrel and the .22 Gewehr (21)

    The 1930 Chevy Coupe needed a lot of work, even being only 5 years old. One had to make constant adjustments to critical engine components--tedious work involving shims and getting doused by rancid motor oil. Often the sons would do this work...the parents didn't know English so the only point in going into town was for business and occasionally for father to play concerts for the people of Mott or New Leipzig, even then a son was needed to translate for father. The sons, however, had places to go all the time; and so the Coupe was kept running in order most of the year.


    The sons learned to drive as soon as they could see over the wheel and press the pedals. The oldest brothers learned first, they were all only a couple years in age difference. They all took an interest in dancing and young women around the same time--the coupe, sometimes taking hours to repair, was a better ride into Mott than walking. A car would give them an edge.

    And so they would ride into Mott or New Leipzig every weekend night after dinner for a dance, a gathering of youth around the county. They put on white button shirts, ties, suspenders, wool trousers. They would arrive a few hours before sunset in summer and return around midnight--it was closer to midnight when they returned because of the Coupe. Otherwise it was two or three when they walked to six miles back from Mott.

    In the backseat of the Coupe they laid Thomas' .22 Long Rifle, das Gewehr, more comfortable to speak their first language to family than the English they had to speak outside the family.

    On the ten to fifteen minute drive down the washboard road to Mott they passed around das Gewehr and fired from the windows of the moving coupe at small game--rabbits, prairie dogs, pigeons grazing, fence posts, rocks, retired threshers, grass, dirt, hills.

    After four miles they would encounter the Mongrel. Mongrel was a mixed-breed dog with a very bad disposition. He chased their horses on the way to Mott, he chased the car and tried to bite the tires. Snarling and barking all the way for a quarter mile. First on the way to Mott, and then again on the return late at night.

    One summer evening on the ride to Mott, Mongrel came running up to the car, barking and biting at the car.

    They tried to speed up, and so did Mongrel. Mongrel nipped at the tire, brother Tom saw, and flew into a furious rage "He could have popped the tire, will you just run him over already, Leonard?"

    "He gets out of the way, " Leonard said factually--as if he had tried before when Thomas was too young to remember.

    "Then..." Thomas reached down for das Gewehr, picking it up by barrel near the muzzle BANG.

    The side of the window blew out, Leonard hit the brakes hard to see what happened. Mongrel ran away. Thomas had been shot.

    They all turned slowly to see, Thomas yelled in pain--the bullet went straight through his bicep and out the other side and threw the window. My grandfather picked up the rifle, pulled the bolt to expel the casing and load a new round and fired once more from the window at Mongrel as he ran away. He missed.

    Leonard hit the gas and raced into Mott for the doctor. The doctor was on his way home. He looked at the arm and gave them bandages to keep the wound covered, then told him to return on Monday for a check up.

    The brothers drove Thomas back home, his arm swelling massively.

    From that night on, the Mongrel stayed in the ditch to bark at the coupe with the brothers inside--and they never shot at him again.